1991 Good Game Thread | MyFootballNow

Re: 1991 Good Game Thread by Smirt211 @ 10/14/2020 11:42 am LOL Good game. If you've noticed through the years I always have hyped you up/given you compliments. any ways, new post for the other thing.
Re: 1991 Good Game Thread by Smirt211 @ 10/14/2020 11:42 am Injuries flings the sim engine off a Grand Canyon-esque cliff SPLAT. Mmm, decisions to make. Of course, I lose him before this game. Last edited 10/14/2020 3:45 pm
Re: 1991 Good Game Thread by raidergreg69 @ 10/14/2020 11:51 am Smirt211 wrote: Injuries flings the sim engine off a Grand Canyon-esque cliff SPLAT. Mmm, decisions to make. Of course, I lose him before this game. I don't want to discuss injuries as they're piling up like dead bodies in the Hudson River. Generals injury list is 14 players long. Did the commish change it to 200???
Re: 1991 Good Game Thread by Smirt211 @ 10/14/2020 12:14 pm I saw notifications as our game was proceeding. Just looked now. Yikes!!! My decision is a non-one based on opponent. Green lit. 9 defensive plays in a 32 game sample. applauds Last edited 10/14/2020 4:19 pm
Re: 1991 Good Game Thread by vcr5150 @ 10/14/2020 12:25 pm gg Pittsburgh/tribewriter. That one got way too close at the end. Liked by tribewriter

Re: 1991 Good Game Thread by Hellbringer @ 10/14/2020 12:28 pm GG Oklahoma. Found some pass plays that work
Re: 1991 Good Game Thread by raidergreg69 @ 10/14/2020 12:46 pm vcr5150 wrote: gg Pittsburgh/tribewriter. That one got way too close at the end. Just wrote this game up in the blog and I'm curious about the 2 point conversion logic.
Re: 1991 Good Game Thread by trslick @ 10/14/2020 1:14 pm GG Express, we could not stop the run!
Re: 1991 Good Game Thread by tribewriter @ 10/14/2020 2:08 pm vcr5150 wrote: gg Pittsburgh/tribewriter. That one got way too close at the end. Yeah, can't believe how the offense came to life after being dead in the water for three quarters. Doubt that Pittsburgh will win a game, but maybe they will at least make some people nervous.
Re: 1991 Good Game Thread by CrazyRazor @ 10/14/2020 2:09 pm raidergreg69 wrote: CrazyRazor wrote: GG Portland. You got a whole lot of LB's playing back-up DE's. Better keep an eye on their weight. A couple of his LB used to be DE and still have weight on them. Any other LB playing DE must be 80 or less speed. That's why I said, "Better keep an eye on their weight".........