Welcome to the new Beta version of the MyFootballNow website! Please note that while using the Beta website, some features may not work correctly and other features are not complete. Some elements, such as notifications and chat, may act strangely during the time that both versions of the site are available. If you need to return to the old version, click on the button below.
Good game. If you've noticed through the years I always have hyped you up/given you compliments.
any ways, new post for the other thing.
Re: 1991 Good Game Thread
by
Smirt211
@
10/14/2020 10:42 am
Injuries *flings the sim engine off a Grand Canyon-esque cliff*
SPLAT.
Mmm, decisions to make. Of course, I lose him before this game.
Last edited 10/14/2020 3:45 pm
Re: 1991 Good Game Thread
by
raidergreg69
@
10/14/2020 10:51 am
Smirt211 wrote:
Injuries *flings the sim engine off a Grand Canyon-esque cliff*
SPLAT.
Mmm, decisions to make. Of course, I lose him before this game.
I don't want to discuss injuries as they're piling up like dead bodies in the Hudson River. Generals injury list is 14 players long. Did the commish change it to 200???
Re: 1991 Good Game Thread
by
Smirt211
@
10/14/2020 11:14 am
I saw notifications as our game was proceeding. Just looked now. Yikes!!!
My decision is a non-one based on opponent. Green lit.
9 defensive plays in a 32 game sample. *applauds*
Last edited 10/14/2020 4:19 pm
Re: 1991 Good Game Thread
by
vcr5150
@
10/14/2020 11:25 am
gg Pittsburgh/tribewriter. That one got way too close at the end.
gg Pittsburgh/tribewriter. That one got way too close at the end.
Just wrote this game up in the blog and I'm curious about the 2 point conversion logic.
Re: 1991 Good Game Thread
by
trslick
@
10/14/2020 12:14 pm
GG Express, we could not stop the run!
Re: 1991 Good Game Thread
by
tribewriter
@
10/14/2020 1:08 pm
vcr5150 wrote:
gg Pittsburgh/tribewriter. That one got way too close at the end.
Yeah, can't believe how the offense came to life after being dead in the water for three quarters. Doubt that Pittsburgh will win a game, but maybe they will at least make some people nervous.
Re: 1991 Good Game Thread
by
CrazyRazor
@
10/14/2020 1:09 pm
raidergreg69 wrote:
CrazyRazor wrote:
GG Portland. You got a whole lot of LB's playing back-up DE's. Better keep an eye on their weight.
A couple of his LB used to be DE and still have weight on them. Any other LB playing DE must be 80 or less speed.
That's why I said, "Better keep an eye on their weight".........
