1991 Good Game Thread | MyFootballNow

Re: 1991 Good Game Thread by raidergreg69 @ 10/25/2020 11:57 pm setherick wrote: Or ... you could do what I suggested way back during the McKeon controversy and what we instituted in Paydirt during the same time, and have the rule say that 276# is the minimum weight for a DL. Otherwise, I'm going to play to whatever the rule says. If that's what it takes to quit talking about this, that's what we'll do then. At this rate, we'll be GM League #2, which isn't necessarily a bad thing.
Re: 1991 Good Game Thread by setherick @ 10/25/2020 11:57 pm If we are going to put this in place next year, I would like to know so that I can switch my tweeners to full time LDE now. :)
Re: 1991 Good Game Thread by raidergreg69 @ 10/25/2020 11:59 pm setherick wrote: If we are going to put this in place next year, I would like to know so that I can switch my tweeners to full time LDE now. :) Yes, I'm not having a vote. I am so sick of discussions and complaints. In fact, I may even set weight requirements across the board. We need to get back to having fun at this game instead of playing who can find the best exploits.
Re: 1991 Good Game Thread by setherick @ 10/26/2020 12:00 am raidergreg69 wrote: setherick wrote: If we are going to put this in place next year, I would like to know so that I can switch my tweeners to full time LDE now. :) Yes, I'm not having a vote. I am so sick of discussions and complaints. In fact, I may even set weight requirements across the board. We need to get back to having fun at this game instead of playing who can find the best exploits. But ... I'm not even using the _best_ exploits. :) Switching Baker to LDE this game. I need to figure out who else is moving around. UPDATE: All my DL are now listed as DL. Last edited 10/26/2020 4:04 am
Re: 1991 Good Game Thread by raidergreg69 @ 10/26/2020 12:08 am setherick wrote: raidergreg69 wrote: setherick wrote: If we are going to put this in place next year, I would like to know so that I can switch my tweeners to full time LDE now. :) Yes, I'm not having a vote. I am so sick of discussions and complaints. In fact, I may even set weight requirements across the board. We need to get back to having fun at this game instead of playing who can find the best exploits. But ... I'm not even using the _best_ exploits. :) Switching Baker to LDE this game. I need to figure out who else is moving around. I'm not trying to single you or anyone else out, I'm just trying to stop the complaints. I'm hearing it on multiple fronts about more than 1 exploit issue.

Re: 1991 Good Game Thread by setherick @ 10/26/2020 12:09 am I know you're not singling me out. I just want to know now so I can get players up to weight now. Otherwise, my DL is going to get benched 8 games.
Re: 1991 Good Game Thread by raidergreg69 @ 10/26/2020 12:16 am setherick wrote: I know you're not singling me out. I just want to know now so I can get players up to weight now. Otherwise, my DL is going to get benched 8 games. Yes, I am saying DL must be 276 lbs next season, beef the boys up. As for the rest of the roster exploits, I'm going to sleep on it and decide if I'm going the GM league route, or simply letting the league vote. FYI, the GM league route entails minimum weights across the board. Liked by CrazyRazor
Re: 1991 Good Game Thread by CrazyRazor @ 10/26/2020 1:40 am I'm glad you guys discussed this. I was about to do something drastic. (Like switch players around to push the limits of these rules.) Only to prove a point.
Re: 1991 Good Game Thread by CrazyRazor @ 10/26/2020 2:45 am GG Tampa Bay.
Re: 1991 Good Game Thread by tribewriter @ 10/26/2020 8:45 am GG Oakland. As unlucky as the Maulers were last week against Portland, they were lucky this week—two pick-sixes, which you don't see every day.