[/quote]
Um, actually you're capped at 3 completed trades per season with one team if I remember correctly. That number isn't really important to the topic at hand though. [/quote]
Basically what I'm saying is... if we are going to have a Conversation about Playing Fair and Ethically... shouldn't we have a Fair and Ethical Conversation?
He could Post the Trades he's citing... especially since the amount of Trades over the span of time he offered don't match up.
He's giving anecdotal evidence while stating clear cases exist. Why not just present (accurately) the clear cases?
If you and I were having a discussion and my 'facts' were badly misrepresented, you wouldn't accept my premise would you?
I'm not saying there isn't an issue, I'm saying that the perspective of certain things (Weights differ drastically from Owner to Owner, Stats shouldn't reflect the NFL because MFN and the NFL are completely different, etc.) needs to be considered.
So when he states Unrealistic Stats... Unrealistic in comparison to what? The NFL? Of course the NFL and MFN are going to have wildly different Stats. League by League the MFN has wildly different Stats.
And when discussing Trade Inequality and Quantity... presenting realistic Quantities would be nice. And even better Linking the Trades in question.
So one Team sent High Picks for Players. Were they Good Players, and the Coach failed to get the most of them? Maybe he Game Plans poorly. You could give him the Pro Bowl Team and he'd sink it. Is that a Bad Trade? Or is that a Good GM/Bad Coach making a **** of a Trade but being ineffective in using the Talent he Acquired?
Just because 2 Teams had 4-6 Trades over 2 Seasons, and one Team Won while the other Lost, doesn't mean the Trades were bad. Especially since the Team LOSING PLAYERS was Winning... despite bringing in a slew of Rookies and presumably shipping out Vets for those Picks.
Some more Context would be nice here.