raidergreg69 wrote:
No, I don't think mimicking NFL stats is a lot to ask for a football game that models itself after the NFL.
Yes it matters if the stats match, or are at least close. A lot of us originally joined because it's an NFL sim, we love the NFL, and we'd like our game to somewhat resemble it.
For the record, When I was CSB I got killed for choosing this hill to stand on.
I will not stand on the mighty Hill of Realism ever again when what I really want is a new UI (getting it) and fixes.
I've been where some of y'all still are.
That was my experience. I won't repeat it. I hope others don't follow such a path that leads only to conflicts and not progress.
Today, I just trust JDB and I really love MFN. JDB is very active these days which is great stuff. He seems to be very focused. He's always been incredibly amazing to me and to us.
It's why I am here and why I came back.
I will ask the die hards standing on the Hill of Realism as I once did - and as I was picked apart for in the past once again:
Let's pretend MFN did not follow the NFL schedule/divisions/conferences; that MFN were to be 14 wk seasons, 4 conferences of 8 teams, no divisions, playoffs of only the division winner (4 team) bracket) yadda...
I will ask again: IF MFN did not follow the NFL so closely and IF it were different of a presentation that removed NFL comparisons, what would you say about fixing the game play itself?
(also a re-question to CJ)
Again, not trying to be a goober, I just want additional explanation and discussion.
Is it the game play or is it the lack of Realism that matters most?
PS: It was incredibly hard for me to accept MFN as it is and to become positive about the progress I've seen from it. It really, really was.