Game 4: Andrew Reece 17/37 - 229 - 2 - 1 72.92


Four game totals:

Att Comp Pct Yds Yds/Att Sk/Yd TDs Lng Int Rat
137 68 49.6 1,045 7.63 9/57 11 76 3 92.87

Still hovering around the 50% mark, but the 4:1 TD:INT ratio was much better than anticipated.

Nine game totals:

174/352 - 2,490 - 16 - 6 - 80.80

Still hovering at the 50% mark, but otherwise, he's been average as a starter. And a good FA pick up.

Perhaps some talent around him or different plays could boost his %?

Maybe, but I don't think an upgrade over the current WRs and TEs would give that much of a bump.

Final stats: Andrew Reece (QB) 211/427 - 49.4 - 3,162 - 21 - 8 82.70

After a back and forth battle, Reece got the start over Burns. And, boy, is he back. I simplified the offense some, but I never thought this guy would get to 60% completions.

Andrew Reece 23/39 - 352 - 3 - 0 114.48

And so begins my futility in 0.4.4

With what I have seen so far, mine too

Says the guy that scored 21 with a QB that had 273 yards on your 0.4.3 offense.

It was my 0.4.2 offense. ;P
I went back to it in all my leagues once I knew 0.4.4 was being released.

It's also the biggest reason I lost this first game. (We were still in 0.4.3)