raymattison21 wrote:
Brrexkl wrote:
I like it. I makes sense as well. You are more effective in real life with a Play that you know, and against a Play you recognize and/or practiced against, than you are on a Play you don't know.
Most Teams only run a handful of Plays in actuality, but they mask it by running that Play from a variety of formations. Now, other Teams have a plethora of plays and more complex concepts, but to each their own in that regard.
I mean in reality the HB Dive Strong from the I Form, I Strong and I Weak... it's the exact same play. The only difference is the route the FB takes to Lead the Run. Same would go with something like an Shallow Flood out of each... nothing really changes between those 3 Formations. This is so a Team can master a Play, but disguise it to a Defense by being able to run it in 3 Different 'Fronts' or 'Looks'.
.
I do not like play familiarity and i think your view on how the nfl might associate it is extremely simple way to look at the game. Everything changes and uses different rules within the assignments for every example you provided.
Sounds like you played alot of madden and a little actual football.
Sorry for being so intrusive in this suggestion but your inaccuracies in this thread towards the actual game of football is just disrespect to the game. Good night !
I will be looking for a league near you...
I played in High School, and I was on the Practice Squad (Non-Scholarship) as a Walk On at the U of Alabama for a Season (had enrolled in College previously, only had a Season of Eligibility remaining and didn't crack the roster in that time).
You are completely misunderstanding what I'm saying. It's very frustrating and irritating.
You are talking about changes in responsibility depending upon Defensive Formation. That is going to happen regardless.
Against a 43 Under, the FB in a Weak, Strong or Balanced I is going to have the exact same responsibility if he's designated the Lead Block. As I stated, they can us him instead to seal the back, and Pull an OL to Lead instead. But in a LEAD Dive, he's going to do the same thing, just from a different angle.
It doesn't matter if he's Strong, Weak or Balanced, if he's the Lead he's going to the same **** spot against that Defensive Alignment. Nothing changes for him, if he's the designated Lead, because of the difference in where he's aligned. Do you understand this point?
Now against a Base 43, he's going to have a different responsibility. He's still the Lead, but the OL/TE had to adjust their blocks, because it's no longer the Under. But against the Base 43, it doesn't matter that the FB is in a Weak, Strong or Balanced... if he's the Lead he's going to the same place starting from a different angle. Do you understand this point?
Nothing at all changed for the FB, despite him being in a Weak, or Strong, or Balanced because of HIS Alignment. It only changed because of the DEFENSIVE ALIGNMENT. Do you understand that?
A TE flexing out is very much the same. The type of block will change because he'll be attacking from a different angle, but he's still going to key the same guy. Follow?
What you are discussing and what I'm discussing are not the same thing, and your constant failure to recognize that is getting tiresome.
Which is all piled ON TOP of you not actually saying anything towards the ACTUAL SUGGESTION.
Which has NOTHING to do with anything at all you've discussed. The SUGGESTION, the entire POINT OF THE POST, is that I'd like to be able to tell from the Player Card which **** plays are in the (1) in the Coaches Play Book and (2) Active. Do you have literally anything at all to say on THAT point?