There isn't always a player with low volatility at the top of the board.
Also, IRL there are players who are nearly a "sure thing", and others that could go either way. That is the way I see the volatility rating.
Do I take the 90 rated guy with 75 volatility, or the 80 rated guy with 5? The first player has a higher ceiling, but a lower floor. However, I'm not going to be disappointed with the 80 player because
he is who I thought he was.
Then there are cases like Andrew Luck / Adrian Peterson where you pretty much know going into the draft that they are going to be great players.
I don't see it as a bad thing that we now have a little more information to help us make a better decision on who we draft. I much prefer this over a 100% **** shoot.
I
don't think the NFL draft is always a 100% **** shoot for every player.
Last edited at 9/08/2016 6:21 am