Gustoon wrote:
murderleg wrote:
Gustoon wrote:
murderleg wrote:
Gustoon wrote:
murderleg wrote:
Gustoon wrote:
Gramps has had the ***** to bring up the Elephant in the room and NO ONE has had the ***** to even remotely agree with him.
Seriously if anyone thinks this game is snow white, you are truly deluded. There is a problem in here and it is easy to find, if you look hard enough.
What?
No one said the problem didn't exist. Nobody said they didn't agree with him that it exists.
I personally told him to take it out with JDB, not call some poor guy out on the forums. Like I said, all it does is make people feel like s*** when they don't need to. I also asked him to present real evidence, which he didn't do in his scenario.
I also told him to shut it with the sarcasm. It's annoying as ****.
Anyway, nobody is denying that the problem exists. WarEagle even explicitly said that earlier.
This is just neither the place or situation to do so.
Sorry can't be arsed to read all the way through yet another thread on this.
Where is then?
The place, like I said, is PMing JDB.
It is important we discuss this after we can prove the suspect was cheating,
but finding that out is a private discussion. It's none of our business unless we are the ones accusing or receiving.
We don't need a lynch mob every time Gdad sees two lopsided trades going to completely different owners!
No such thing as private
Again, what are you saying?
If I believe that someone is cheating I give my evidence to JDB and he deals with it.
We don't need you and the community to go around with false claims policing everyone in your unfounded accusations. King is exactly right.
Nobody can see my messages with JDB. Since that is the case I call it private. Privacy exists, that why they are
private messages.
Now who's making unfounded accusations, find me a thread where I have called someone out?
(don't waste your time).
While your at it, we might as well take away the commentary on trades, just in case the conversation develops into innuendo.
I never said you called someone out, but you did justify people who do. Again, with all due respect this is wrong. You don't seem to be reading what i'm writing. You are constantly putting words in my mouth.
I am saying the public forums aren't the place to call out cheaters. That is
all I am saying. As Kind said (which you seems to agree with, did you even read what he wrote?)
King of Bling wrote:
BS that it's OK to fling unfounded accusations with no evidence other than someone's 'opinion'!
I know I've been accused of cheating and nothing could be further from the truth.
If you're that unhappy, don't play. However, don't even think of condoning unfounded slanderous accusations as being acceptable or part of the game.
Commentary on trades is perfectly fine, and discussing cheating is fine with a smaller sample of people. When the whole website starts hating an account for no good reason, then thats a problem and justifying it is illogical. You can create a system where the account gets a bad rap only when guilty, or they can get a bad rap even when they are innocent. Justifying the latter, like I said, is completely illogical.
What is your alternative? Do you want the community forums to vote on it? That would be a horrible plan!
Last edited at 9/01/2016 3:13 pm