GrandadB wrote:
I'm not"blasting a poor guy" as there is no guy based on reviewing the account activity. Proof? the only thing you can do to arrive at a conclusion like that is to review the account activity and transactions versus results in game play.
GrandadB.
I'm not trying to pile on to you, but to me it seems you are missing the point that some of us (maybe just me) are trying to make about your "proof". This R*** T*** (
I'm not saying that name) may indeed be a fake or duplicate account, but you cannot use account activity or game performance to determine that.
Some of us really enjoy this game and are here everyday. But, this is a free game. There are going to be other owners who only "drop in" from time to time, and let the AI handle most things. Some of those will have successful teams, and some of them will not. Heck, some successful owners who are here everyday let the AI handle most things and are not very active in terms of transactions.
Your "proof" is proof of nothing more than that the owner is not very active, or good, or both.
My only issue with your comments comes down to semantics. I don't think there would be as much of an issue with them if you didn't imply speculation (even if it appears to be common sense) is "proof".
I hope you take this in the spirit it is intended, which is constructive criticism. I don't want you to feel like you don't want to post ideas, or even suspicions if the situation calls for it.