I'm just thankful I don't get everyone's best shot every game. It's the benefit of not being the best...everyone doesn't try harder against you and I get their 2nd or 3rd best shot.
It makes me wonder how many owners have regular gameplans saved plus Smirt gameplans used only versus him.
It's strange to me because I use the same gameplan versus all opponents and if someone actually had a #1 gameplan to be used versus Smirt, why wouldn't that just be their every game gameplan?
Just thoughts I have when Smirt says he gets everyone's best shot...not sure what that entails and maybe he does but since Smirt rarely loses it doesn't seem to be working.
Maybe the fear of playing Smirt forces owners to make major changes to their normal gameplans and it backfires on them...just a thought...I for one use the same gameplan for everyone and rarely (postseason) look at who I'm actually playing.
Just my opinion on gameplanning in general....if you are winning with a gameplan then why make major changes based on opponent?
The only thing I do different in the postseason is look for tendencies that my opponent may have and try to attack those through rules. I play way too many games to do that during the regular season so a saved gameplan is the way I go with minimal adjustments over the course of a season.
I just think you can have a great gameplan and get unlucky and lose or have a crappy gameplan get lucky and win but once you have used the same gameplan for at least 4-8 games....you get a better understanding of the positives and negatives in that gameplan. Ideally you want 32 games of data to draw from but version 4.6 is new and not enough games have been played for that yet.