Smirt211 wrote:
....and at some point he stream-lined to for example 1 play against the 2-1-2 set as means of taking on no risk while streaming one play purported to be a world-beater which makes my blood boil. lol
Here's the thing, he'll be that guy who hits the main board down the line with all his %s listed and titles won in great detail for us to bow down to. That's why since he has been chirping on my 2-Pointers I felt the need to shed light on this side of it. :)
I think you're protesting too much bro. You're the one that goes around complaining about how many LCs you've lost.
Anyway, I took a look at the last NY - Georgia game, and both teams used the same variation of defense plays at about the same frequency. Georgia used a ZF and Cover 1 normal base defense, varying the plays for distance (smart!) and pulling in the Double WR2 against the 311 (also smart!) instead of getting stuck running a GL against the exploit PA Flats.
NY made a number of questionable streaming defensive calls like calling the Dime Flat Cover 2 exclusively against the 221. This is standard game plan for this particular owner as I and other owners have observed. (And we won't talk about running the automatic 3 yard FB Dive out of the 230 for 2 point conversions since that's already been talked about.)
From a defensive standpoint, Georgia had the right game plan for this game or, really, any game. If he would have cranked up his 113 and 221 runs for that game, I bet that he would have run away with it.