Welcome to the new Beta version of the MyFootballNow website! Please note that while using the Beta website, some features may not work correctly and other features are not complete. Some elements, such as notifications and chat, may act strangely during the time that both versions of the site are available. If you need to return to the old version, click on the button below.
GG Thunderbolts. My line is blocking well but my QB still has pick days from time to time.
Re: 1982 Good Game Thread
by
cyclonelomax
@
3/08/2019 3:19 am
ouch!!!!!!! gg Gamblers
Re: 1982 Good Game Thread
by
Mcarovil
@
3/08/2019 4:18 am
100 points. Wow.
cyclonelomax wrote:
ouch!!!!!!! gg Gamblers
Re: 1982 Good Game Thread
by
PrivateSnowflake
@
3/08/2019 7:22 am
Mcarovil wrote:
100 points. Wow.
cyclonelomax wrote:
ouch!!!!!!! gg Gamblers
100 points and 1000 yards? So much for "realism"...
Edit: Now I see. Those were some one-sided match-ups down the field. It's a real eye-opener however, to see how important B&R has become to being able to stay with a receiver.
But I do have a question: isn't there supposed to be a malus for using a WR as a RB because of the slighter builds? Or was that just something that was discussed? Thanks!
Yeah that's not a good thing. I just played seth in another league. Although we won 6-3, watching his team was like watching a pro team play a flag football team. A very noticeable difference in the plays ran, completion% etc.. but special teams had me thinking about going back to playing Madden again. It was never more obvious how much information I don't have ( or don't know how to readily find ) until that game.
Great game Otter, Boatman 100% avoid fumble has another one!
Re: 1982 Good Game Thread
by
Otterpop
@
3/08/2019 11:10 am
trslick wrote:
Great game Otter, Boatman 100% avoid fumble has another one!
Good Game Slick. MY Quarterbacks just cannot avoid throwing interceptions even when I tell them not to throw the ball. I think I know what position I need when the draft comes around.
But I do have a question: isn't there supposed to be a malus for using a WR as a RB because of the slighter builds? Or was that just something that was discussed? Thanks!
I just had to look up the word "malus." I am not smart enough to compete in this league.