Welcome to the new Beta version of the MyFootballNow website! Please note that while using the Beta website, some features may not work correctly and other features are not complete. Some elements, such as notifications and chat, may act strangely during the time that both versions of the site are available. If you need to return to the old version, click on the button below.
Eligibility * A player is eligible for nomination upon retirement. * A player must have completed five full seasons to be eligible. The first ballot will be the exception. Process * Any USFL/WFL coach, past or present, can nominate a player for Hall of Fame induction. * A three-member screening committee will add any needed additions to the nominations and finalize the ballot for that season. * Only players on the ballot are eligible. There are no write-in votes. * A player who receives 75 percent of the votes cast will be inducted into the Hall of Fame. If no player receives 75 percent, the top vote-getter will be inducted. * A player who receives 25 percent of the votes cast will automatically be placed on the following year’s ballot.
For the Proposal
24
Against the Proposal
3
Re: Vote: Hall of Fame Process
by
Pernbronze
@
9/27/2018 6:10 pm
For clarified that means only 1 player per season?
Re: Vote: Hall of Fame Process
by
tribewriter
@
9/27/2018 6:21 pm
No. "A player" means "any player." I will edit that when posting the final language.
Re: Vote: Hall of Fame Process
by
Hellbringer
@
9/27/2018 7:19 pm
I don't agree with a part of this, should I vote against it then?
Re: Vote: Hall of Fame Process
by
SunBlaze22
@
9/27/2018 7:23 pm
Personally I'm not that sure about the 25% vote getting to be on the ballot automatically next year part. Either it needs to be raised a bit higher or just get rid of that whole aspect altogether. I mean, the player can always be nominated again next year. I don't know, it's just kind of weird to me. Just my two cents though.
Personally I'm not that sure about the 25% vote getting to be on the ballot automatically next year part. Either it needs to be raised a bit higher or just get rid of that whole aspect altogether. I mean, the player can always be nominated again next year. I don't know, it's just kind of weird to me. Just my two cents though.
I'm with SunBlaze- I like the proposal but the minimum % needs to be raised to at least 45-50%, maybe even higher, if it ends up staying in. Otherwise, ditch that aspect altogether and nominate them again the next season.
