If 63 of 320 are HOF worthy, maybe the standards should be raised. I'm thinking only the top 1-5% of players should make it, which would be between 3 and 16 players in the initial HOF class. IMO we should then consider no more than 30 players initially.
Re: Hall of Fame Process Language for Discussion
by
raidergreg69
@
9/16/2018 8:31 pm
8 hours is way too much time Booger, sorry I can't give those hours back to you. This was just supposed to be a fun thing for the league, not a huge monumental task.
Re: Hall of Fame Process Language for Discussion
by
Pernbronze
@
9/17/2018 2:24 pm
I think by worthy he means of consideration. There's a lot of players who are worthy but never get in despite nearly yearly consideration.
Re: Hall of Fame Process Language for Discussion
by
tribewriter
@
9/21/2018 12:56 pm
OK, I have given this a week for discussion. I will compile some language for a league-wide vote soon.