People who liked this post
Spoilers
Draft War Room

  • USFL/WFL
    • League Home
    • Power Rankings
    • Hall of Champions
  • League Forums
  • Players
    • Search
    • Draft History
    • Trades
  • Coaches
    • Search
  • Draft
    • War Room

  • Community
  • Log In
Hall of Fame Process Language for Discussion
League News/General Discussion
  • ‹
  • 1
  • 2
  • ›
raidergreg69
Re: Hall of Fame Process Language for Discussion
by raidergreg69 @ 9/16/2018 8:24 pm
If 63 of 320 are HOF worthy, maybe the standards should be raised. I'm thinking only the top 1-5% of players should make it, which would be between 3 and 16 players in the initial HOF class. IMO we should then consider no more than 30 players initially.
raidergreg69
Re: Hall of Fame Process Language for Discussion
by raidergreg69 @ 9/16/2018 8:31 pm
8 hours is way too much time Booger, sorry I can't give those hours back to you. This was just supposed to be a fun thing for the league, not a huge monumental task.
Pernbronze
Re: Hall of Fame Process Language for Discussion
by Pernbronze @ 9/17/2018 2:24 pm
I think by worthy he means of consideration. There's a lot of players who are worthy but never get in despite nearly yearly consideration.
tribewriter
Re: Hall of Fame Process Language for Discussion
by tribewriter @ 9/21/2018 12:56 pm
OK, I have given this a week for discussion. I will compile some language for a league-wide vote soon.
Liked by ToroTex, Pernbronze
  • ‹
  • 1
  • 2
  • ›
Copyright ©2013-2026 Catalyst Productions | Weather data powered by Visual Crossing
Game Engine Version 4.6 | Website Version 357c692
Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy