If you don't know your Week 15 result, stop reading.
I hate that the MFN tiebreakers aren't posted anywhere because it might matter. Tiebreakers could get real interesting if the results break right. I can do an easy breakdown and a difficult one. Let's get started.
American ConferenceClinched Home Field: San Antonio
Clinched Division: Denver, Michigan
Clinched Wildcard: Houston
In the Hunt: San Jose, Honolulu, Portland, Memphis
Easy breakdown: San Jose, Portland, and Memphis just need to win to get in. Honolulu needs a win and help.
SchedulesSan Jose vs Oklahoma
Honolulu @ Southern California
Portland @ Washington
Memphis vs San Antonio
Difficult Breakdown: Looking at the schedule, there is a good chance we'll have some tiebreakers for the final spot or two. The first key is what San Jose does. If they win they win the division with Portland, Memphis, and Honolulu fighting for 2 spots. If San Jose loses and Honolulu wins, they'll be tied for the division lead and they split this season. They would have identical 5-1 division records in this scenario and common games is supposed to come before conference record, at least it does for the NFL...
To Break A Tie Within A Division
If, at the end of the regular season, two or more clubs in the same division finish with identical won-lost-tied percentages, the following steps will be taken until a champion is determined.
Two Clubs
Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games between the clubs).
Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division.
Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games.
Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference.
Strength of victory in all games.
I know that strength of victory = net points in MFN, but where exactly does it fit in the MFN tiebreaker order? It matters, as San Jose has that while Honolulu would have conference record if they end up tied (they are tied now at 7-4 but if they both finish 10-6, San Jose will be 7-5 in conference while Honolulu would be 8-4).
Does net points replace common games? That's a good suggestion for the MFN committee, pin JDB down on the exact tiebreakers.
So, not knowing how to break a possible tie between San Jose and Honolulu, I need to run tiebreakers for both teams against Portland and Memphis, 2 way and 3 way. Why? Because in any 3 or 4 way tie, you must break division ties first.
The following tiebreak scenarios assume San Jose, Portland, and Memphis lose while Honolulu wins If San Jose wins, their tiebreaker might be with Denver for seeding. If Portland and Memphis both win, seeding as well.
San Jose/Portland...inconclusive if both 10-6, no head to head, would have same conference record and Portland is +146, San Jose +136 in points
San Jose/Memphis...Memphis based on a Week 1 win over San Jose
San Jose/Portland/Memphis...In this scenario, Memphis is eliminated based on conference record while SJ/Port tie determines 6/7 seeds
Portland/Memphis...no head to head but Portland would have a better conference record
Honolulu/Portland...Portland beat Honolulu head to head Week 3
Honolulu/Memphis...Honolulu beat Memphis Week 13
Honolulu/Portland/Memphis...Honolulu and Portland advance with Memphis losing out based on conference record
__________________________________________________________________________
I hope this comes across in a sensible manner, I was typing while I was interpreting the rules.