People who liked this post
Spoilers

  • USFL/WFL
    • League Home
    • Power Rankings
    • Hall of Champions
  • League Forums
  • Players
    • Search
    • Draft History
    • Trades
  • Coaches
    • Search

  • Community
  • Log In
2002 Good Game Thread
League News/General Discussion
  • ‹
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • ...
  • 13
  • 14
  • ›
trslick
Re: 2002 Good Game Thread
by trslick @ 11/14/2022 10:00 am
GG Cj
Cjfred68
Re: 2002 Good Game Thread
by Cjfred68 @ 11/14/2022 10:10 am
GG Slick!
Smirt211
Re: 2002 Good Game Thread
by Smirt211 @ 11/14/2022 12:04 pm
Another byproduct of forcing 217 lbs. from out of the backfield.

63% knowledge on the play; 95-96% on the defensive call. It's the not having the 95 speed flying out of the backfield to protect myself.

I should get the QB health restored. it was a great call; not an idiot GM feeding a d to get a QB killed.

Not cool.
raidergreg69
Re: 2002 Good Game Thread
by raidergreg69 @ 11/14/2022 1:28 pm
Smirt211 wrote:
Another byproduct of forcing 217 lbs. from out of the backfield.

63% knowledge on the play; 95-96% on the defensive call. It's the not having the 95 speed flying out of the backfield to protect myself.

I should get the QB health restored. it was a great call; not an idiot GM feeding a d to get a QB killed.

Not cool.


While rare, QBs can and do get hurt in this game and you should have had a backup QB on the roster just in case.

Idk what 217 lb RBs have to do with your QB getting hurt, but the league has voted twice to not allow WR to play RB and we're not opening up that can of worms again just yet.
Liked by jabillups85
Smirt211
Re: 2002 Good Game Thread
by Smirt211 @ 11/14/2022 2:02 pm
raidergreg69 wrote:
Smirt211 wrote:
Another byproduct of forcing 217 lbs. from out of the backfield.

63% knowledge on the play; 95-96% on the defensive call. It's the not having the 95 speed flying out of the backfield to protect myself.

I should get the QB health restored. it was a great call; not an idiot GM feeding a d to get a QB killed.

Not cool.


While rare, QBs can and do get hurt in this game and you should have had a backup QB on the roster just in case.

No, I'm good. I'll figure it out and continue to break records everywhere with 1 QB.


Idk what 217 lb RBs have to do with your QB getting hurt, but the league has voted twice to not allow WR to play RB and we're not opening up that can of worms again just yet.

Many different ways I won't get into or reveal on how 217 lbs. aid the defense. Here, the outlet didn't fire out quick enough, therefore, took the blitz and injury.

Peeps like my boy Big Ups! can have a bloodlust to see me fail even after removing me from their league for no reason but it won't stop me.

I'm just blowing off steam, Greg. I looked that every QB is 100% healthy and didn't like how mine went down and hit here to get energy to deal with it.
raidergreg69
Re: 2002 Good Game Thread
by raidergreg69 @ 11/14/2022 2:19 pm
It might be something with older QBs being more susceptible to injury. Before Don Ferguson retired, he got hurt and missed time so my current starter, then my #2 had to play in the playoffs.

I don't want you to reveal your secrets, I was just mainly wanting to shut the door on any 217 lb RB discussion before it gets started. We just voted on this last season and it's much too soon to attempt to try again.

I get the temptation to only carry 1 QB since they rarely get injured, but I've been too scared to do it except in CJ's no injury league. Scared because of this exact scenario, having just 1 guy and he's pretty banged up.

You might be able to play Plummer anyway, and the timing is bad since the trade deadline has passed. I suspect you'll be trying to sign Hansen.
Liked by Waitwut, Smirt211
Smirt211
Re: 2002 Good Game Thread
by Smirt211 @ 11/14/2022 2:23 pm
It's the 100% injury rate, older-slow QB and a medium pass on a blitz, which I should have nailed for a TD but left the crack open for a determined sim to injure him.

If I had a jobber GM I'd say what I'm doing but I have a burning ears CJ, therefore, I won't tip anything.
Cjfred68
Re: 2002 Good Game Thread
by Cjfred68 @ 11/14/2022 3:06 pm
Smirt211 wrote:
It's the 100% injury rate, older-slow QB and a medium pass on a blitz, which I should have nailed for a TD but left the crack open for a determined sim to injure him.

If I had a jobber GM I'd say what I'm doing but I have a burning ears CJ, therefore, I won't tip anything.


That's funny!

I didn't even realize you were next on my schedule not that it would change my gameplan in any way. It's the regular season and I'm in way to many leagues plus my added responsibilities to do anything but load my saved gameplan, make minute adjustments and do a normal scout.

Honestly, I hope you win! It's just not that important to me!
Smirt211
Re: 2002 Good Game Thread
by Smirt211 @ 11/14/2022 4:44 pm
Good game, Rialto.
pdoug20
Re: 2002 Good Game Thread
by pdoug20 @ 11/14/2022 11:39 pm
raidergreg69 wrote:
Good game Boston, really made us work for this W and we needed a defensive TD to do it. Only 1 game before our rematch so see you real soon.
So close, yet so far... see you in the rematch!!
  • ‹
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • ...
  • 13
  • 14
  • ›
Copyright ©2013-2026 Catalyst Productions | Weather data powered by Visual Crossing
Game Engine Version 4.6 | Website Version 5790fa3
Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy