Do we want WR to be allowed to run the ball in 1998?
No
Re: WR at RB
by
raidergreg69
@
12/29/2021 11:19 am
With the switch to 4.6, playing WR at RB is happening again in many leagues. Our rules currently don't allow this, but should we scrap this rule for next season?
|
|
Re: WR at RB
by
raidergreg69
@
12/29/2021 12:47 pm
I'm not counting my vote yet, I had to pick something to see the results. If you've already voted, subtract 1 from the yes column.
Personally I'm 50/50 about this. I'm hoping 1 option has a clear margin over the other, if not, we may need further discussion. |
|
Re: WR at RB
by
trslick
@
12/30/2021 1:48 pm
When I do this, they are switched to RB position, I just don't like out of position play!
|
|
|
|
|
Re: WR at RB
by
raidergreg69
@
12/30/2021 4:13 pm
I'll probably close this poll Monday so please vote if you haven't yet.
There are good points to both sides of this. Personally, I like it the way it is but I'm not against using WR. |
|
Re: WR at RB
by
ArmoredGiraffe
@
12/30/2021 4:47 pm
I don't think it's overpowered using a WR at RB, but I personally prefer only having RB's at RB
|
|
Re: WR at RB
by
setherick
@
12/31/2021 8:59 am
I personally don't care one way or the other but there is nothing that suggests wrs are better than rbs at running the ball. See the out of position data: https://bigdata.myfootballnow.com/forums/1/61?page=1#275
|
|
Re: WR at RB
by
raidergreg69
@
12/31/2021 11:03 am
If anyone wants to use WR @ RB, you better get your votes in. Right now it's 10-5 against it, so it looks like the RB only rule won't change.
|
|