Welcome to the new Beta version of the MyFootballNow website! Please note that while using the Beta website, some features may not work correctly and other features are not complete. Some elements, such as notifications and chat, may act strangely during the time that both versions of the site are available. If you need to return to the old version, click on the button below.
6 Turnovers wont get it done vs anybody, especially not you. Obviously QB is a glaring need for the Express and something to think about heading into the offseason. Express will be limping to the finish with very difficult games coming up including but not limited to Oakland and Baltimore.
Gl with your playoff run!
Last edited 8/31/2020 8:20 pm
Re: 1990 season
by
Dogboyuk75
@
8/31/2020 4:24 pm
gg royce nice win for the stars defence they shut me down
Re: 1990 season
by
setherick
@
8/31/2020 6:13 pm
raidergreg69 wrote:
setherick wrote:
Good game greg! Always a grind when we play.
Good game Seth, I'm surprised we won. Even with no Roquemore, I expected a lot of Willis to Wink. Good luck in the playoffs.
I'm not surprised. Roq is 3/4 of my offense.
---
Off topic, it's about to turn September, which means I'll be moving back to more of an auto-pilot mode.
Re: 1990 season
by
setherick
@
9/02/2020 6:53 am
GG Oakland. I feel lucky in that one. I thought I had switched HCs before the game (didn't double check), so I put in all of my rules and the game got called completely randomly on defense.
Last edited 9/02/2020 11:54 am
Re: 1990 season
by
trslick
@
9/02/2020 9:39 am
GG San Jose
Re: 1990 season
by
hollyhh2000
@
9/02/2020 10:22 am
trslick wrote:
GG San Jose
Good game Honolulu!
Boy, losing that one hurts. I was prepared for a loss as some of my core guys were banged up, but to give it away after that comfortable lead, withmissing 2 makeable FGs and not doing anything with a golden opportunity after that late fumble. Ouch.
I'm going through the games, writing the blog when I came across the Portland/Oakland game. Portland had a player get 7 sacks, LB Frank Baker. I did not check where he lined up because he only has 76 speed, so no rule was broken. Oakland got destroyed twice last year by McKeon, so this tells me Oakland is still running the same offense
After all of the tense discussion over this matter, you gotta know you can't throw 80% of the time against Seth.
Re: 1990 season
by
Smirt211
@
9/02/2020 12:45 pm
Weak I Normal All Go
Culprit.
Quick scan. It took on 5 sacks.
Last edited 9/02/2020 5:46 pm
Re: 1990 season
by
raidergreg69
@
9/02/2020 12:49 pm
Smirt211 wrote:
Weak I Normal All Go
Culprit.
Quick scan. It took on 5 sacks.
Yup, Oakland had way too many pass attempts, and a lot of the wrong ones at that. I just wanted to be the one to point it out so everyone knows no rule was broken.
I'm going through the games, writing the blog when I came across the Portland/Oakland game. Portland had a player get 7 sacks, LB Frank Baker. I did not check where he lined up because he only has 76 speed, so no rule was broken. Oakland got destroyed twice last year by McKeon, so this tells me Oakland is still running the same offense
After all of the tense discussion over this matter, you gotta know you can't throw 80% of the time against Seth.
My game plan defaulted to a lot of 46 on downs when it shouldn't have because of my rule build not matching my defensive playbook. It'll be corrected by next game. In that, I'll still use a lot of 46, but not as much as I did.