Welcome to the new Beta version of the MyFootballNow website! Please note that while using the Beta website, some features may not work correctly and other features are not complete. Some elements, such as notifications and chat, may act strangely during the time that both versions of the site are available. If you need to return to the old version, click on the button below.
gg royce some weeks i can ride my defence and sometimes i get outclassed by a more well run program and this was one of those weeks.see you in couple of game weeks buddy
Re: 1989 Good Game Thread
by
Hellbringer
@
6/19/2020 4:26 am
GG Denver. Not sure how we pulled that off, but a win is a win
gg royce some weeks i can ride my defence and sometimes i get outclassed by a more well run program and this was one of those weeks.see you in couple of game weeks buddy
Good game. I have no doubt you'll get your team rolling! Keep it up
Re: 1989 Good Game Thread
by
trslick
@
6/19/2020 8:46 am
GG Express
Re: 1989 Good Game Thread
by
Mcarovil
@
6/19/2020 10:09 am
Sometimes the SIM just wont help your team. We are much more evenly matched that the outcome JAX. That INT on the goal line changed the landscape for sure.
Re: 1989 Good Game Thread
by
Mcarovil
@
6/19/2020 10:13 am
Should I change all my RBs to WRs to gain speed? Does it make that much of a difference? Asking for a friend.
Last edited 6/19/2020 3:14 pm
Re: 1989 Good Game Thread
by
setherick
@
6/19/2020 11:09 am
Mcarovil wrote:
Should I change all my RBs to WRs to gain speed? Does it make that much of a difference? Asking for a friend.
It's 20# which means 2-3 SP depending on frame (hidden). It's a matter of flavor at the end of the day and not a deal breaker. If you want to hybrid a guy to WR, then play them at WR and get to the next SP breakpoint. If you want to flex to FB, leave him as a RB.
WOW! Didn't expect that *** whoopin'. Dunno what happened there. Good game/Bad game raidergreg.
Re: 1989 Good Game Thread
by
raidergreg69
@
6/19/2020 1:09 pm
CrazyRazor wrote:
WOW! Didn't expect that *** whoopin'. Dunno what happened there. Good game/Bad game raidergreg.
I figured if there was an *** whoopin, I'd be on the receiving end since the Generals haven't played well against good teams last couple seasons. Looks like the sim rolls were in my favor. Good luck rest of the season.
Re: 1989 Good Game Thread
by
Cjfred68
@
6/19/2020 1:17 pm
Are all the owners playing Setherick trying to help him set a sack record???
LONG PASSING DOESNT WORK AS A LEGIMATE STRATEGY!!!
This version was push back on the 9000-10,000 passing yards per season days of 4.2 and 4.3.....its completely transitioned to a short passing/running offense with a sprinkle of medium and dash of long passing thrown in to keep it honest.
Long passing is nerfed so before Setherick put a speedy linebacker on the front four...long passes ended up being a sack, incomplete or an interception 90% of the time if it was a slow developing play with no outlet.
Now that Seth is employing LBs up front....long passing will result in about 85% sacks.
STOP CALLING LONG PASSES!!!
Literally set you play call to 0% long passing and watch the sacks fad away....and maybe you will actually win a game or 2.
