People who liked this post
Spoilers
Draft War Room

  • USFL/WFL
    • League Home
    • Power Rankings
    • Hall of Champions
  • League Forums
  • Players
    • Search
    • Draft History
    • Trades
  • Coaches
    • Search
  • Draft
    • War Room

  • Community
  • Log In
1989 Good Game Thread
League News/General Discussion
  • ‹
  • 1
  • 2
  • ...
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • ...
  • 30
  • 31
  • ›
Dogboyuk75
Re: 1989 Good Game Thread
by Dogboyuk75 @ 6/19/2020 5:06 am
gg royce some weeks i can ride my defence and sometimes i get outclassed by a more well run program and this was one of those weeks.see you in couple of game weeks buddy
Hellbringer
Re: 1989 Good Game Thread
by Hellbringer @ 6/19/2020 5:26 am
GG Denver. Not sure how we pulled that off, but a win is a win
Liked by AlexanDragon
RoyceR
Re: 1989 Good Game Thread
by RoyceR @ 6/19/2020 9:16 am
Dogboyuk75 wrote:
gg royce some weeks i can ride my defence and sometimes i get outclassed by a more well run program and this was one of those weeks.see you in couple of game weeks buddy

Good game. I have no doubt you'll get your team rolling! Keep it up
trslick
Re: 1989 Good Game Thread
by trslick @ 6/19/2020 9:46 am
GG Express
Mcarovil
Re: 1989 Good Game Thread
by Mcarovil @ 6/19/2020 11:09 am
Sometimes the SIM just wont help your team. We are much more evenly matched that the outcome JAX. That INT on the goal line changed the landscape for sure.
Mcarovil
Re: 1989 Good Game Thread
by Mcarovil @ 6/19/2020 11:13 am
Should I change all my RBs to WRs to gain speed? Does it make that much of a difference? Asking for a friend.
Last edited 6/19/2020 3:14 pm
setherick
Re: 1989 Good Game Thread
by setherick @ 6/19/2020 12:09 pm
Mcarovil wrote:
Should I change all my RBs to WRs to gain speed? Does it make that much of a difference? Asking for a friend.

It's 20# which means 2-3 SP depending on frame (hidden). It's a matter of flavor at the end of the day and not a deal breaker. If you want to hybrid a guy to WR, then play them at WR and get to the next SP breakpoint. If you want to flex to FB, leave him as a RB.
Last edited 6/19/2020 4:09 pm
Liked by Mcarovil
CrazyRazor
Re: 1989 Good Game Thread
by CrazyRazor @ 6/19/2020 12:59 pm
WOW! Didn't expect that *** whoopin'. Dunno what happened there. Good game/Bad game raidergreg.
raidergreg69
Re: 1989 Good Game Thread
by raidergreg69 @ 6/19/2020 2:09 pm
CrazyRazor wrote:
WOW! Didn't expect that *** whoopin'. Dunno what happened there. Good game/Bad game raidergreg.

I figured if there was an *** whoopin, I'd be on the receiving end since the Generals haven't played well against good teams last couple seasons. Looks like the sim rolls were in my favor. Good luck rest of the season.
Cjfred68
Re: 1989 Good Game Thread
by Cjfred68 @ 6/19/2020 2:17 pm
Are all the owners playing Setherick trying to help him set a sack record???

LONG PASSING DOESNT WORK AS A LEGIMATE STRATEGY!!!

This version was push back on the 9000-10,000 passing yards per season days of 4.2 and 4.3.....its completely transitioned to a short passing/running offense with a sprinkle of medium and dash of long passing thrown in to keep it honest.

Long passing is nerfed so before Setherick put a speedy linebacker on the front four...long passes ended up being a sack, incomplete or an interception 90% of the time if it was a slow developing play with no outlet.

Now that Seth is employing LBs up front....long passing will result in about 85% sacks.

STOP CALLING LONG PASSES!!!

Literally set you play call to 0% long passing and watch the sacks fad away....and maybe you will actually win a game or 2.
Last edited 6/19/2020 6:20 pm
Liked by Mcarovil, Infinity on Trial, raidergreg69
  • ‹
  • 1
  • 2
  • ...
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • ...
  • 30
  • 31
  • ›
Copyright ©2013-2026 Catalyst Productions | Weather data powered by Visual Crossing
Game Engine Version 4.6 | Website Version 357c692
Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy