I've noticed that frequently 'Elite' o-lineman don't seem to produce on par with their level when it comes to the passing game. For instance, in a recent game my 90 rated RT gave up 4 sacks to a 60 rated DE with 25 pass rushing ability. On the other side, my 99 rated LT allowed 2 sacks to another mid-60s DE. This was on 28 drop-backs in a game I averaged 12+ YPC (which should be taking the edge out of the pass rush). Not to mention how many times they gave up pressure that same match, leading to absolutely atrocious QB play. Anecdotal evidence aside--and acknowledding that obviously no player(s) will always play perfect--but I've noticed in general that sacks seem to run a little high, and that may be one contributing factor.
It's worth noting that from my personal view, I do believe that elite linemen DO produce in the run game. In fact, this may just be symptomatic of a larger issue, wherein the running game is very predictable, but passing is almost a complete crapshoot. If you have great blockers and a great RB, you can expect to have a great running game. If you have great run defense, you can expect to (mostly) stop the run. Generally speaking, I think the run game
works. Yet passing seems to always be erratic. Bad QBs throwing to bad WRs will tear apart a phenomenal defense while a great QB throwing to great WRs behind a great o-line will fall to pieces versus middling talent. Naturally there will always be an RNG element (any given Sunday!), but at times it seems frustratingly unpredictable from game to game, with big/broken plays frequently being the only real determinant factor, rather than stringing together steady methodical drives.
Anyone else have thoughts on this? Differing perspectives? Would welcome some dialogue to see where others land on this.