Gustoon wrote:
Mr.Krazy wrote:
Sure a dynasty.. Lol good thing there from foxborough
They're good but not that good, yet.
In todays game you are putting them on the same tier as the pats? No the hawks are not a dynasty team at them moment.
There have been some great dynasty teams, Indy, Pitt, Dallas, Miami, San Fran and of course Green Bay. I'm sorry to say that none of those teams compare to what the Pats have done in this last decade, picking late in the draft, picking up other teams cast-offs and cobbling championship calibre teams....BB will go down as possibly the greatest ever HC...... you still think that Seattle are a dynasty team?
The talk of dynasty teams doesn't come from Seahawks fans (as far as I have ever seen). I am sorry for the confusion. The back story is if you perouse the seahawks forums, instagram etc etc etc you will constantly come across whiners (49'ers fans) hijacking threads putting the seahawks down. They dismiss the seahawks as a flash in the pan and tell the fans to shut up in their own forums.
About the patriots, was last season the first they have won since the spy scandal broke? and did that not come off the back of another scandal? Sorry but i couldn' t call dynasty on the back of cheating. By the way if I am wrong I apologise in advance.
As for seahawks being a dynasty: if we continue the way we are going for another 5 years. 1) our defence leading the league in 90% of the categories. 2) winning at least 2 more superbowls. Would we not qualify to be spoken of in the same breath as the famous vikings defence and any other team & era considered a dynasty? yes a lot of water to flow BUT a little respect would be nice. After our SB win against Denver there were talks of the FBI investigating the betting on the game for Gods sake. ANYWAY.....
GO HAWKS!
p.s MR Krazy i knew i liked you for a reason, pity you're a redneck bahahahahaha
Last edited at 4/23/2015 8:18 am