I would like to suggest that the trade balancer uses a different criteria when only draft picks are traded. I am fine with wide disparities when players are involved because each owner can view a player(s) differently with different values.
But draft picks are more cut and dried. You know where they are going to be. MFN-2 just had a draft pick only trade that was 2100 points to 1051 points. There is no way this trade was done without collusion. Team A was 10-6 last season and traded first, second, fourth and seventh round picks to Team B, who was 1-15, for first, second, third and third round picks. All the picks are in the same draft! So Team A moves up about 20 spots in the first, 20 spots in the second, dumps fourth and seventh round picks for two thirds! No way this trade was done without collusion.
For draft pick only trades, the balancer should force the totals to be within 10% of each other, or something like that.
https://mfn2.myfootballnow.com/forums/1/1162?page=1&x=nYUP0xU8t2#3722