Maybe the algorithm should be simplified, as it is, it is laughable.
Here is the scenario now. With ranking loses and the rank of the team they lost to with B being below 15.
Baltimore is 1 and undefeated.
TN is 2 with 3 loses to 1, 11, 6.
NY is 3 with 3 loses to 7, 8, B.
Atl is 4 with 4 loses to 8, 11, 15, B.
SF is 5 with 2 loses to 4,3.
Cinn. Is 6 with 3 loses to 1, 1, 11.
AZ is 7 with 2 loses to 5, B.
Wash is 8 with 2 loses and a tie to 9, 5, and tie to B.
KC is 9 with 3 loses to B, 3, 1.
Clev. Is 10 with 6 loses to 15, B, 1, 2, 6, 1.
Indy is 11 with 2 loses to 1, 2.
NJ is 12 with 3 loses to 1,2,7.
Carolina is 13 with 6 loses to B, 4, 2, 15, 4, B.
Chi is 14 with 5 loses to 10, 8, B, B, 5.
Max is 15 with 5 loses to 11, 6, 2, 2, 4.
So, here is how I would rank them approximately:
1.) Balt. 12-0,7 wins in the top 15.
2.) TN 9-3, 6 wins in the top 15.
3.) Indy 10-2, 4 wins in the top 15.
4.) SF 10-2, 3 wins in the top 15.
5.) AZ 10-2, 2 wins in the top 15.
6.) Cin 9-3, with 3 wins in the top 15.
7.) Wash 9-2-1, with 3 wins in the top 15.
8.) NY 9-3, with 2 wins in the top 15.
9.) Atl. 8-4, with 3 wins in the top15.
10.) KC 9-3, with 1 win in the top 15.
11.) Jax 7-5, with 2 wins in the top 15.
12.) Clev. 6-6, with 1 win in the top 15.
13.) NJ 9-3, with 0 wins in the top 15.
14.) Chicago 7-5, with 1 win in the top 15.
15.) Carolina 6-6, with 0 wins in the top 15.
I think that my team should be no lower than 3 with loses only to 1 and 2, and with wins against 2, 4, 6, and 15.
Last edited at 11/23/2016 5:21 pm