jsid wrote:
I see it as a feature that also helps with a few exploits (changing position, cutting, then extending long term for cheap for instance), but I think the opinion should factor in the player talent level. In one league I filled out my team in the preseason with a few guys to play STs for the preseason, and I'm not realizing that none of them will probably ever sign with me ever again, even though I may be the only team to offer a contract. That's the biggest problem i'm facing right now. These guys below 65 potential should just be happy they're on a roster at all!
65 with 100 speed has value in a newer league, but not so much in a league with over 10 seasons. Still, the majority might just be happy to play, but what if it were a scheme player with a thousand yards or 30 sacks. How about a 65 QB with two rings under his guidance.
Let them test the market any way, cause if they were worth it you would have given them a contract in the first place. Still, this debate might be pointless as i have had no problems with contracts at all.
Last edited at 10/12/2016 4:22 pm