New Sticky Note

The new user interface is in preview!

Want to check it out? Click here! (If you don't like it, you can still switch back)

League Forums

Main - General MFN Discussion

Re: Trade Wieght Again

By Gustoon
12/07/2015 10:48 am
Out of necessity and curiosity I have sent out the same trade to nearly all teams, the difference on the trade bar is now a lot more consistent, but some teams just will flat out not let me send the same offer as its just way too unbalanced, those teams are Philly, Tenn, Atl, NO,

Most of the teams I sent it to were all around the same area, so I can only conclude that some teams personal player weights are way out of wack

Re: Trade Wieght Again

By jdavidbakr - Site Admin
12/07/2015 10:56 am
Gustoon wrote:
Most of the teams I sent it to were all around the same area, so I can only conclude that some teams personal player weights are way out of wack


It's not using any personal player weights, but if you're dealing draft picks it does put each team into one of four quadrants based on their previous draft position.

Re: Trade Wieght Again

By Gustoon
12/07/2015 11:03 am
Oh right, I'm guessing that those teams picked relatively high then, would it also try and predict where they may be picking based on the current team talent as well?

Re: Trade Wieght Again

By Gustoon
12/22/2015 4:21 am
Still not right with some teams/leagues.


This trade is absurd. Both owners want to do the trade but the only way to get it done is either offer a 1st or a 2nd & 3rd + player. I dunno, seems a little exorbitant to me. (MFN 20. Tenn & NJY)
Last edited at 12/22/2015 4:22 am

Re: Trade Wieght Again

By ibblacklavender02
12/22/2015 9:16 am
Gustoon wrote:
Still not right with some teams/leagues.


This trade is absurd. Both owners want to do the trade but the only way to get it done is either offer a 1st or a 2nd & 3rd + player. I dunno, seems a little exorbitant to me. (MFN 20. Tens & NJY)


I might be in the minority here but I feel like a player with a potential to reach a 76 should cost a 3rd round pick! The fact he added in a player should turn it into a 4th round pick!
Last edited at 12/22/2015 9:16 am

Re: Trade Wieght Again

By parsh
12/22/2015 9:27 am
This trade shouldnt be allowed but the other way ... lol. Here's my logic:

Given how some of the new drafts are, you can fairly easily find a TE with a potential of 75 in the third round. So to me the potential TE for the second rounder is a wash.

Seeing as how Team B is throwing in a veteran TE + a 3rd (where you can still find starters), I would say Team A is getting the better end of the deal ...

Just my 2 cents ...

Re: Trade Wieght Again

By Kboum
12/22/2015 9:40 am
parsh wrote:
This trade shouldnt be allowed but the other way ... lol. Here's my logic:

Given how some of the new drafts are, you can fairly easily find a TE with a potential of 75 in the third round. So to me the potential TE for the second rounder is a wash.

Seeing as how Team B is throwing in a veteran TE + a 3rd (where you can still find starters), I would say Team A is getting the better end of the deal ...


Just my 2 cents ...



with the 2 picks he can find 2 players just like the one hes trading I wouldnt do that if I were team B

Re: Trade Wieght Again

By WarEagle
12/22/2015 10:52 am
parsh wrote:
This trade shouldnt be allowed but the other way ...


Either way you look at it, this trade is FAR from having the appearance of collusion, or one owner taking unfair advantage of another, etc.

Therefore, it SHOULD be allowed.

In my opinion, of course.

Re: Trade Wieght Again

By parsh
12/22/2015 2:54 pm
WarEagle wrote:
parsh wrote:
This trade shouldnt be allowed but the other way ...


Either way you look at it, this trade is FAR from having the appearance of collusion, or one owner taking unfair advantage of another, etc.

Therefore, it SHOULD be allowed.

In my opinion, of course.


That statement on my part was sarcasm ... Btw.

Re: Trade Wieght Again

By lump7502
1/01/2016 2:39 pm
i have had the misfortune to have the top pick on a team that had been gutted by a previous owner. i seriously needed to trade out of it and couldnt no matter what i tried was denied before i could even propose it. trading out of it may have allowed me to fill a couple of needs while only taking a few points hit on my main selection. things seriously need to be loosened up some.

But at the same time i understand how the current climate makes the bar a must. But i am wondering if a system could be put in place to try this trade if enough of the other owners didnt object and the trade would sit in a waiting period to give the other owners a chance to object