setherick wrote:
Lamba wrote:
So I'm at the point where I'm just about giving up on getting good results from my TEs. I'm thinking it's a result of "everyone" playing coverage LBs who are as fast and specialized in this one job.
https://ags.myfootballnow.com/player/3638That guy should, imo, come down with far more ***** than he does. When looking at his skills, turning him into either a RB or WR, he should dominate and get 85+ speed as well.
Would you change his position?
I had the best te the league has seen before him, but even then couldn't get really good production, compared to that of journeyman WRs.
I have not problem getting good production from TEs playing them as TEs:
https://mfn19.myfootballnow.com/player/10838https://champions.myfootballnow.com/player/2932
Even bad ones:
https://mfn8.myfootballnow.com/player/10482
Yeah, there's production, but why do we have so suffice with 50-60% reception rates, when they can go to 70%+ easily, played at WR?
I'd say Ronald Lilley, apart from his speed, is my best overall player. Yet he could hardly catch a cold.
This is his game records this season. The ones with yellow lines are the two games since I moved him to WR.
Out of 10 games, only in 5 of them, have he had above 50% reception rate. Since moving him to WR, it's been 70%+.
I'll obviously keep monitoring this, while I'll allow a lesser TE to pick up where Lilley left, but I'm very curious why this is. In 10 of 13 games of the season, he's now up to a career high 60% reception rate.