jdavidbakr wrote:
A player's future rating can potentially improve if he moves to a new position, but only if there is some distance between his current and future rating. I think you'll have a hard time finding a WR who has enough future coverage skills to justify moving him to a DB position.
The issue of preventing a move brings up a common question about the lesser of two evils - we have users like those of you who have expressed concern in this thread, who have legitimate reasons for moving a player position. That is how I envisioned the game from the beginning. But on the other hand you have users like we've seen who intentionally tank their games resulting in, as we have seen, 100+ points being scored by their opponents. That is a huge break from reality as well. So what is the lesser of the two evils? Honestly I'm not sure. I may take that block out of the new version and allow this conversation to continue.
Right. I completely agree. But I'm sure people would find other way to do that.. This change would limit position switches. . would it have any impact on what position players can be placed into on the depth chart?
Instead of switching my RB to WR, would it be possible to assign him to the depth chart as a WR without changing his position?
